BrandStand » Social Media

Social Media

July 19, 2010 | Lisa Wieting

Old Spice “Swan Dives” into a Game- Changing Social Media Campaign

The Google CFO referenced Old Spice’s viral marketing campaign in an earnings call, stating “It just gives you a glimpse of where the world is going.”

So true, Patrick Pichette, but I think it’s even more than that. The Old Spice YouTube Tweetathon altered the social media landscape in one day.

1. Corporate Libertarianism

Kudos to Procter & Gamble for trusting its team to attempt this epic experiment with little to no supervision. ReadWriteWeb wrote a great post about how the videos are being made. The company has entrusted a team of social media guys, marketers, scriptwriters, creative and tech support to create 87 short videos in 11 hours…7 minutes per video. This leaves VERY little time for an approval process. Social media is about real time, and Procter & Gamble gets it.

Side note: It’s incredible that all of these people could work together so efficiently and effectively. Walls between departments are falling fast, and lines are being blurred. To create a successful social media campaign, you need the skills of creative, PR, marketing, copywriters, tech and social media professionals to get the job done. I for one am psyched about this collaborative philosophy.

2. “What’s Next?” Has Been Answered…for Now

Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, foursquare…these applications have established themselves as the giants. For the past six months, it seems that everyone has been regifting these concepts. Social media began to blend into the humdrum of everyday marketing until July 15. The Old Spice campaign took what was available and reinvented how these applications could be used together. What’s next? Looking at what’s available and pushing the limits of its capabilities. This will dictate future applications.

3. Human Nature Explored

Social media has made the idea of “15 minutes of fame” possible…except now it’s 15 seconds of fame. It has made the distance between celebrity and civilian shorter. Old Spice capitalized on both of these concepts. Social media users were invited to ask questions directed toward the “Old Spice Guy” – Isaiah Mustafa. The responses were tracked, and the most interesting or highest-profile inquiries were addressed via personalized video, doing the following:

Feeding consumers’ egos by utilizing their creativity/ideas to drive the topics of the videos
Giving consumers their 15 seconds of fame through personalized video
Bridging the gap between the brand and the customer
Closing the distance between celebrity vs. civilian by streaming videos for Alyssa Milano and Jonathan on Facebook as equals

Brands are going to need to refocus their attention from defining who “they” are to defining who the customer is and how to create a personal, engaging and lasting relationship. We are a self-centered, ego-driven, short-attention-span society, and now that we know what is possible, expectations are going to change.

Update: The Old Spice personalized videos have amassed more than 5.2 million views! That is more than some (many) television programs.

2 Comments

June 10, 2010 | Melissa Eggert

TOMS: The Outstandingly Marketed Shoes

Have you heard of TOMS? I first heard of the company two years ago when a roommate in college starting sporting the simple, canvas slip-ons. I was attracted to the style of the shoe and inquired further, only to find that for every shoe purchase, another pair would be sent to a child in need. You’re telling me I can buy cute shoes and help a third-world country at the same time? Sold.

Cause marketing is nothing new. And according to reports, it’s known to be effective. Bob Gilbreath, chief marketing strategist at Bridge Worldwide and author of “Marketing with Meaning,” stated this year that:

71% of consumers are giving as much or more now as they were before the economic downturn.
87% of consumers would switch brands based on association with a good cause.
50% of consumers would pay more for products from brands that support causes.

Yet what sets TOMS apart from the rest is the company’s holistic understanding of creating brand ambassadors. From social media to its website to packaging to ad campaigns to designer contests to founder Blake Mycoskie’s talks around the nation (shout out to Vanderbilt!) customers are able to plug in, converse, interact, advocate, and promote TOMS shoes. The company informs you via videos about shoe drops in Africa, posts pictures of you wearing your TOMS wherever you are, asks you for advice on the next line of styles, replies to your tweets, encourages you to host TOMS parties, and always, always keeps its mission clear and simple – One for One.

This week, I received my first pair of burlap slip-ons at the office. In the sustainable box were my shoes with One for One inscribed on the insole. Collateral told me to take the fabric TOMS flag that was wrapped around the shoes and post a picture of myself holding it to their website. It also told me how to find out more information about the impact TOMS has around the world. Finally, they included a sticker for me to slap on my Nalgene.

Today, you’ll see my TOMS flag on my bulletin board. You’ll see my TOMS sticker on my Nalgene. You’ll see my TOMS shoes on my feet. And most importantly, you’ll find the newest TOMS Brand Ambassador.

1 Comment

April 16, 2010 | Steve Chitwood

Finally, a chirp worth tweeting about.

Though Twitter, the popular microblogging service is ubiquitous in the online world, headlines for the company have been fleeting for much of the last year. Moreover, in the discussions I’ve been privy to at various industry events, the consensus seemed to be building that Twitter had reached its zenith and had begun its slow glide to obscurity. Facebook and LinkedIn status updates and location-aware social applications like Gowalla and Foursquare have been growing and seem to better answer users’ desires to stay instantly connected to the social grid. The lack of a strategy to monetize the service has kept advertisers and major brand marketers at bay along with their budgets and ability to facilitate innovation and consumer adoption.

Alas, an early spring chirp was finally heard this week signaling a possible resurgence. At the Chirp Conference Twitter execs announced a series of significant changes that address much of what the industry has been crowing about:

• The really big news is promoted tweets, a new advertising platform where advertisers can buy access into a topical Twitter stream. With some similarities to Google’s AdWords platform, this might just start building a justification for the billion-dollar valuation the revenue-neutral service has earned thus far.

• User Streams, a new data service provided by Twitter to desktop applications. This allows developers access to real-time data directly from Twitter. Look for a flock of new Twitter-enabled applications in the near future.

• A developer roadmap to calm the fears of developers and marketers about the service and where it is going. Look for increased functionality around location awareness, annotations, and other features.

• A new home page to address the high abandonment rate of new subscribers. Early tests show a 20% increase in retention.

Along with the technical discussions, Twitter management also shared data about the service that has long been speculated and rarely confirmed. It turns out that Twitter is bigger than we all expected. According to cofounder Biz Stone, Twitter has nearly 106 million registered users and 180 million unique visitors a month—far above many previous industry expectations. To date, the service has been tight-lipped about this type of information. Even more impressive, Twitter is growing at a rate of 300,000 new users a day, The Wall Street Journal reports.

Twitter still has a rough flight ahead. Archenemy Facebook is gearing up for the annual F8 Conference, which promises the unveiling of new features and direction for the 400 million user–strong social network. But for now, Twitter can enjoy the warm glow of springtime optimism.

No Comments

April 15, 2010 | Lisa Wieting

Crisis Communication Rules for Social Media – Open to Interpretation

If you looked at 20 resources offering guidance for dealing with negative feedback on business-focused social media sites, you will find very similar rules:

Respond quickly
Address the situation
Stay positive

In theory, this advice makes perfect sense. In reality, it doesn’t always work. Take one of our experiences for example.

Round 1: A young, vocal detractor posted a negative review on a client’s Facebook page. I would categorize it as a somewhat merited attack expressed in a very vengeful manner. When the post was discovered, we proceeded with the customary strategy:

Responded promptly.
Addressed the concern of the detractor, thanked him for bringing it to our attention, and provided some insight into what steps were being taken to resolve the perceived problem.
Invited the detractor to contact the company (provided a name and number) to discuss any questions or concerns in person.

Textbook fix, right?

Result: Apparently, this particular book was a “choose your own adventure” volume—and the detractor chose an alternate ending. Within minutes of our client’s posted response, the detractor began a full-scale attack campaign, recruiting friends and family to join forces in harassing the company through Facebook. One negative comment turned into eight, which then turned into a photo album, leading to the grand finale—an “I Hate” Facebook page. Why did this happen, when we’d done everything “right”?

Round 2: We responded, again inviting the detractor to an in-person meeting to discuss concerns. Each direct response actually seemed to motivate the detractor to step up his smear campaign, leading to an increase in negative postings. We obviously needed a new strategy:

Against all common advice, we did not post immediate responses to the continued negative comments. The attention only encouraged the detractor.
Since each personal response fueled the fire, we addressed the perceived problem globally through status updates and addressed it to the entire Facebook community instead of responding personally to the detractor.
We invited everyone in the Facebook community to contact the company if they had any questions or concerns regarding the perceived problem.
We began proactively posting status updates about any and all steps or programs in place addressing the perceived issue.

Result: Brand ambassadors began speaking up, complimenting the company and posting positive reviews. The attack campaign fizzled. Since we became more proactive with our posts regarding the perceived problem, it has left little room for negative feedback. We continue to monitor the “I Hate” page, and activity there has significantly decreased.

In Conclusion: I have every confidence that the detractor will come back, but we are prepared. The standard steps for handling negative feedback on social media sites are a good starting point, but that is all they are … a starting point. The response an unhappy consumer may take to those steps is unpredictable. If things take a sharp turn toward the unexpected, you may have to take the time to re-evaluate your steps and pursue an unexplored path—one that is customized to your unique crisis. As we all know, the exceptions make the rules.

2 Comments

March 26, 2010 | Karen Johnson

My Theory on Social Media Sentimentality

Before I launch into my theory on how the success of Facebook is heavily linked to its stronghold on sentimentality and nostalgia, let me first establish my credentials on matters relating to sentimentality.

My paternal great-grandfather presented a unique engagement ring to my great-grandmother. Small by today’s standards, the ring featured a half-carat, semi-rare yellow diamond set in gold with etchings consistent with the period. Stunning. This ring was passed down to my grandmother, then to my mother, and now sits comfortably in my jewelry drawer. Or at least it rested there until two weeks ago. At 3:38 p.m. on a Wednesday afternoon, my phone rang. On the other end? The mom of the second-grader for whom my son Luke has a deep crush. Seems Quinn came home from school and sheepishly revealed to her mom that Luke had asked her to be his girlfriend and, upon seeing her nod, presented her with a small gift. Yes, you guessed it … my precious, sentimentally charged ring.

Think about it. Within a 24-hour period, that ring went from its warm nest in my drawer, to my 7-year-old’s grubby fingers, into the goldfish-cracker-lined zipper compartment of his backpack, all the way to school, then into his tiny pocket, out to recess, through a few rounds on the jungle gym and, when the time was right … onto Quinn’s tiny finger, which, as you can imagine, was way too small to adequately keep the ring securely in place. I can only surmise that Quinn, upon returning from recess, tucked the ring “safely” into her pink backpack’s goldfish-cracker-lined zipper compartment, before boarding her bus to go home.

Phew! Thank goodness Luke is drawn to smart women. Instead of secretly placing the ring in a random special box, Quinn decided to divulge this news to her mom. Obviously, this story has a happy ending. No need to rehash the events that followed, only to say Quinn now has a different token, and my great-grandmom’s ring is back where it belongs, nestled comfortably between an heirloom gold bracelet and my favorite Tiffany tear-drop earrings. Life is good.

But I digress. The subject at hand (or, should I say, ring finger?) is sentimentality as it relates to Facebook. If your high school years are a distant memory and you’re juggling home/job demands while raising a family, there’s a strong likelihood that you are a fan of Facebook for reasons that have more to do with the past than with the future.

Call it sentimentality, nostalgia or basic curiosity, but there’s just something intriguing about reconnecting with peripheral friends and hearing the nuances of their lives. Granted, some details we can do without (“Just took the dog out for a walk,” or “Heading to John’s soccer game.”) But more often than not, we get a fascinating glimpse into the lives of people we’ve always cared about but simply don’t have the time to catch up with this easily via any other form of technology.

Case in point. Jennifer, whom I haven’t seen in 20 years but spent my K-12 school years with, is now a Facebook friend. She recently posted about a dilemma she was facing involving her young son, birthday-party invitations and a bully. She needed help and turned to “us.” What ensued was a delightfully entertaining stream of motherly advice, pearls of wisdom and a ton of “been there, done that.” The exchange was both humorous and educational. Jennifer, who once trusted us with silly teenage secrets and turned to us for fashion advice when she bought her first pair of Jordache jeans, was turning to us once again — only the subject matter has changed. It seems we’re all wading through the same life-stage stream, and Facebook provides the comfort factor of having a familiar face to the name when we seek advice online.

When polled, most of my Facebook friends site: “reconnecting with old friends” as the primary reason they enjoy Facebook and stay active on it. One of my more feisty friends commented, “I love that Facebook offers me the opportunity to peruse through the photos of people I haven’t seen in 20 years and occasionally marvel about how they’ve let themselves go. … I know I’m going to h*ll for that one.”

Few would dispute that Facebook has the capacity to evoke sentimental feelings, by the sheer nature of its design and functionality. And sentimentality can be a strong marketing tool.

No Comments