BrandStand » Public Relations

Public Relations

January 20, 2010 | Robin Lybarger

“Tweet Me” = A Sign of Affection?

In my normal day of perusing the oodles of e-newsletters I subscribe to, I ran across an article in USA Today about how Sweethearts is debuting a “Tweet Me” Sweetheart candy for this Valentine’s Day. The article quotes the VP of Marketing for New England Confectionery, maker of Sweethearts, explaining that the inclusion of the Tweet Me Sweetheart is “in recognition that society is changing the way to say ‘I love you.’ ” Really, could it be?

As a PR professional, I am an advocate of social media, but as a human being I surely don’t agree that this is the evolution of how we show affection. I would love to know who came up with this statement. I think the idea to include the Tweet Me Sweetheart is clever, and the brand received a huge story in USA Today (also linked on the Huffington Post), as well as coverage in the Boston Herald. Also, I am blogging about it (as are others), Twitter is a partner, and there are tweets rolling in about it. But I would have recommended focusing on the fact that the brand responds to what is happening in the culture. The article also talks about its iPhone app, which sounds interesting and further demonstrates NECCO’s ability to evolve with the current happenings. For what is a smart partnership and a great campaign for building conversation about the brands, I would have expected a smarter statement as to the “why.”

In the end, the brands fit really well together … short and sweet. But I have to admit that personally, when it comes to showing affection, I prefer a call, a note, flowers or a hug.

6 Comments

January 14, 2010 | Lisa Wieting

Social Media Census

The 2010 census is campaigning through Twitter…along with Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and YouTube, in the hopes of generating a higher percentage of participation this time around.

This is an open letter to people who do not see the benefit of social media in marketing – namely, my husband, who thinks “social media marketing” is just an excuse to cruise around on Facebook while at work and who to this day is the only person I know without an account. First, let’s take a quick look at the history of censuses. They began during the early Pharaonic Period in Egypt and were used to issue land grants and for taxation purposes. The first U.S. census was conducted in 1790; a census is done every 10 years to record the population, which also helps determine the number of United States Representatives each state receives (thank you Wikipedia).

So, the goal is to count EVERY American. In 2000, the census counted more than 281 million people…talk about a daunting task. This year, though, they have social media to help the campaign. Below are reasons why I think this is cool:

1. If this ancient practice can evolve into the social media landscape, any business can.

2. The U.S. Census Bureau’s sole goal is to reach as many people as possible, and it is turning to social media to help accomplish that. Those wary of social media in business, think about it…the census needs to reach everyone. If social media can help with that, it can certainly help reach different target markets and customers.

3A. I can’t remember hearing a word about the census 10 years ago. I was also in college and had recently turned 21, so that may have had something to do with it. Different priorities.

3B. My 22-year-old brother HAS heard of the 2010 census because it’s being talked about on Facebook and in different blogs he reads. That doesn’t guarantee he will participate, but it certainly presents a better opportunity.

4. It’s mind-blowing to think about how social media/online applications will be utilized in the future and even more exciting that we have the opportunity to help shape it. Will the entire census take place through Facebook or iPhone apps? That means my husband probably won’t be counted as a human because he still won’t be on Facebook.

5. It’s interesting to watch how social media continues to infiltrate different aspects of our lives. We no longer have to look for information, it finds us. The census found me, and for the first time, I will be accounted for.

No Comments

December 18, 2009 | Lisa Wieting

The Pepsi Effect

“Pepsi to Skip Super Bowl After 23-Year Run” – New York Times
“Pepsi Not Advertising in next Super Bowl” – Toronto Star
“Pepsi Takes A Pass on Super Bowl Ads” – CNN Money

CNBC, CBS Sports, NPR, Chicago Tribune, Wall Street Journal the list goes on and on.

If you haven’t heard (you must be living under a rock), Pepsi will not be advertising in this year’s Super Bowl for the first time in 23 years. Instead the soft drink conglomerate will focus on a new marketing effort that will appear mostly online. I can’t help but think…NOT advertising may be one of the most genius PR stunts in recent history.

Lets guesstimate that Pepsi spent $20 to $30 million in Super Bowl ads last year. I’m sure they were clever, well produced and probably featured super stars like Justin Timberlake. So, let’s tack on another couple million dollars just for celebrity endorsement, creative concepts and production. This year, Pepsi pulls their ads sending shockwaves through the advertising world. Not only are they focusing on an “online” marketing strategy vs. traditional advertising but also saving millions of dollars. On top of that, by simply announcing this decision, they have generated millions of dollars in free publicity for this yet-to-be-created online campaign. Everyone’s interest is peaked…what could be so big that Pepsi isn’t advertising in the Super Bowl. You can bet that I will be on alert for this new marketing campaign.

Looking at the bigger picture, what does this mean for traditional advertising? If Pepsi pulls out of the Super Bowl, will Budweiser soon follow suit? Is Pepsi realizing the power of online is more powerful than the Super Bowl? Is this truly a publicity stunt? Time will tell if this move will pay off for Pepsi but this football fan is much more intrigued by Pepsi’s “Non-Advertising” campaign than any 30-second commercial with Justin Timberlake.

Follow the continual stream of news about Pepsi’s big Super Bowl decision on Bing News: http://ow.ly/No97

No Comments

October 19, 2009 | Lisa Wieting

Life on the T-List – Social Media Breeds New Generation of “Celebrities”

As newsrooms shrink, online media is growing as a premiere resource. Twitter, blogs, MySpace and Facebook have emerged as legitimate venues to obtain information and build a brand. Personalities such as Tila Tequila and Perez Hilton have become household names first because of online and social media leading to traditional media exposure later. So what are a few lessons we can take from those on the “T-List?”

Transparency is critical –For the first time, the average person has direct contact with a celebrity, personality, influencer, etc. Twitter users have come to demand authenticity and celebrities that are the most successful “Tweeters” (Ashton Kutcher, Pete Wentz) manage their own accounts. While it may not all be positive attention, people appreciate the opportunity to personally connect. People want honesty, not canned statements. Social media is evolving that expectation.
Time is of the essence – When Michael Jackson passed away, his death was reported on Twitter, Facebook and blogs far before any traditional media source reported his death. By the time information was posted on a news site or broadcast on air, word had spread like wildfire through the online and social media channels making traditional sources appear irrelevant. Instead of going to CNN’s website for “breaking news” people were following threads on Twitter and visiting entertainment blogs for true up-to-the-minute information. Reaction times are nearly extinct with the birth of social media.
Move over A-List – Big names such as Julia Roberts, Cameran Diaz and Brad Pitt all command millions of dollars for a movie role but names such as Heidi Montag, Perez Hilton and Audrina Patridge are just as well known due to social media. “A-Listers” are losing their pull at the box office while online and social media personalities continue to rise. You don’t have to be the biggest or most recognized to be relevant.

For a fun look at how Social Media is changing our lives, check out “Web Site Story”:
http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1913584

No Comments

October 9, 2009 | Robin Lybarger

Honesty Can Be The Best Virtue

With the onslaught of communication channels people expect “transparency”. While I am not a big fan of this buzzword, I think the idea it conveys is here to stay. Put simply, today’s consumers demand companies and individuals to be open and honest. If a company or celebrity tries to hide from an issue, it will certainly spiral out of control. Please note, that if a situation is legal in nature other rules apply.

Now, take the recent situation with David Letterman. Okay, I definitely do not condone his actions of infidelity, but the way he handled the situation publicly was a good example of how to deal with a crisis situation. It was obviously painful to address his infidelity on air honestly and openly, but it squashed rumors and allowed him to own up to what he had done and whom he hurt. A very humbling experience indeed. In my opinion, the fact his fans heard the confession firsthand will certainly bode well for him.

With nearly two decades in the public relations business, I have always counseled my clients to get in front of a crisis. It is important to communicate YOUR message as the conversation will go on with or without you. This is an approach even more important in a world that includes instant communication tools – such as Twitter and Facebook.

At the end of the day, it is only human to respect and appreciate when people are open and honest. I remain amazed at how many companies are still afraid they will lose control if they say too much. Let’s be honest, in most situations if don’t speak up you will lose even more control!

As the Harvard Business blog says, Letterman’s ability to manage the crisis on his own terms helped him contain the damage.

No Comments